Molecular Study of Cryptosporidium spp. in Dogs from Southwest of Iran

AUTHORS

Mehdi Tavalla 1 , 2 , * , Elham Kord 2 , Rahman Abdizadeh 3 , Fatemeh Asgarian 2

1 Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IR Iran

2 Department of Parasitology, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IR Iran

3 Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, IR Iran

How to Cite: Tavalla M, Kord E, Abdizadeh R, Asgarian F. Molecular Study of Cryptosporidium spp. in Dogs from Southwest of Iran, Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2017 ; 10(4):e43412. doi: 10.5812/jjm.43412.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology: 10 (4); e43412
Published Online: April 17, 2017
Article Type: Research Article
Received: October 29, 2016
Revised: March 11, 2017
Accepted: April 5, 2017
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Cryptosporidium is a protozoan parasite that effects rodents, dogs, calves, humans, and cats. Infection with this parasite is known as cryptosporidiosis. Cryptosporidium spp. may induce clinical or subclinical signs in infected hosts. In the life cycle of this parasite infected dogs freely living in urban and rural areas of Khuzestan province are the definitive hosts that should be considered as a real problem in public health for humans.

Objectives: This study aimed at determining the frequency of cryptosporidiosis in dogs in southwest of Iran.

Methods: Overall, 350 fresh fecal samples were collected from domestic dogs living in 43 villages, from June 2012 to September 2013. All samples were investigated by Sheather’s concentration method and fecal smears were stained with modified Ziehl-Neelsen followed by light microscope examination, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Results: The results revealed that frequency of Cryptosporidium infection was 8% and 12.3%, using direct smear and molecular method, respectively.

Conclusions: The present findings indicated that domestic dog feces from southwest of Iran may contain zoonotic parasites such as Cryptosporidium spp. and may be a potential risk for humans and other animals, especially when they contaminate the environment. The role of dogs as source of human infection should be investigated by further studies.

Keywords

Sheather’s Modified Ziehl-Neelsen PCR Dogs Iran Cryptosporidium spp

Copyright © 2017, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

Cryptosporidium is a widespread zoonotic intestinal protozoan parasite belonging to the phylum Apicomplexa that contains 30 species with more than 50 genotypes and infects a wide range of vertebrate animals, including mammalians, avians, amphibians, reptiles, and fish species as well as humans by the fecal-oral route via ingestion of sporulated oocysts (1-3). Cryptosporidium spp. infects the epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract (primarily small intestine and colon) of hosts and may induce clinical or subclinical signs, including vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, fever, anemia, anorexia, dermatitis, and loss of weight, yet, occasionally, some infected hosts may present no symptoms (4, 5).

Human cryptosporidiosis in immunocompetent individuals usually causes acute infection of the digestive system and self-limiting diarrhea, yet, in immunocompromised patients, such as people infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), people with malignancies, solid-organ transplants, and those on hemodialysis may suffer from severe diarrhea and dissemination to extra-intestinal sites, particularly the gall bladder, biliary tract, pancreas, and respiratory tract (6, 7).

Domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are generally considered as the first domesticated mammal from very early in human history (about 12,000 years ago) and are the most abundant species of carnivore around the world today, whoch are the definitive or reservoir hosts of more than 60 zoonotic parasites, such as Cryptosporidium spp. (8-10). Therefore, they are a real problem in public health for humans, particularly in villages and poorly marginalized communities of towns. There are 2 types of dogs in Iran including stray and owned dogs. Stray dogs often live freely in urban and rural areas, and the growing number of these animals in urban and rural residential areas of Iran and their easy access to public environments in order to obtain their nutritional needs from garbage may contaminate soil, food, and water with discharge of helminths eggs and protozoan oocysts, and consequently an increase in parasitic infections in humans and animals. Furthermore, if owned dogs, including shepherd dogs, police dogs, gardener dogs, and pet dogs, are infected by parasites, they can infect occupational groups, such as shepherds, police, gardeners and veterinarians or physicians. In 1983, canine cryptosporidiosis was first reported by Fukushima and Helman (11) in a 3-month-old puppy, which was infected by Distemper disease.

Dogs become infected with the most common species/genotypes of Cryptosporidium spp., which are responsible for human cryptosporidiosis, including Cryptosporidium canis, C. parvum, C. muris, C. felis, and C. meleagridis by direct contact with infected animals (infected dogs and other animals such as ruminant, rodent, and/or ingestion of contaminated food or water from the environment) (12, 13). Therefore, these animals are 1 of the major sources of cryptosporidiosis, which causes the spread of this protozoan in the environment.

Different methods are used for detection of cryptosporidiosis, which are generally based on analysis of stool samples for identification of oocysts using microscopy with tinctorial and fluorescent stains (modified acid-fast, safranin methylene blue, and auramine-rhodamine), antigen detection (immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or genome detection (Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification) in stool samples (14). In addition, serological assays are used for epidemiological studies because specific antibody responses develop after both symptomatic and asymptomatic infection, especially for immunocompromised individuals (15), also considering the importance of zoonotic Cryptosporidium and the possibility of contamination of water and food with this parasite by infected animals.

2. Objectives

Due to the possible roles of dogs in parasite spreading rate, determination of frequency is necessary. Thus, the current study aimed at determining the frequency of cryptosporidiosis in dogs in southwest of Iran.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Area

The study was undertaken in the city of Ahvaz, the capital of Khuzestan Province, which covers approximately 63 238 km2 and is located at 31° 3’ longitude north and 48° 7’ longitude east in southwest of Iran, bordering Iraq and the Persian Gulf (Figure 1). The climate of this area is generally hot and occasionally humid. Summer time temperatures exceed 52°C. This province is known to master the hottest temperatures on record for a populated city anywhere in the world (16).

Map of Iran and Khuzestan Province
Figure 1. Map of Iran and Khuzestan Province

Khuzestan is highlighted with green. Cities of this province are distinguished by colors. The map of Khuzestan province by Uwe Dering was highlighted by Dr. Blofeld.

3.2. Fecal Samples Collection

Villages of Khuzestan province were classified to 5 areas: east, west, north, south, and center. Then, 350 fresh fecal samples were collected from domestic dogs with different ages, according to their teeth, and were grouped in 3 groups, including puppies (< 1-year-old), young dogs (1 to 5 year-old), and old dogs (> 5-year-old), who were living in 43 villages (eas t = 8, west = 9, north = 9, south = 8, and center = 9 villages) from June 2012 to September 2013. In each geographical area, 70 fresh samples were collected from house dogs (owned dogs) and then they were placed in polyethylene bags, marked according to area and were separately carried to the laboratory and kept at 4°C, until processing

3.3. Fecal Examination

All samples were concentrated by sucrose flotation procedure (Sheather’s method, with a specific gravity of 1.21), and thin smears of the concentrated layer of samples were then prepared on glass slides, air-dried, and fixed with methanol, and stained by modified Ziehl-Neelsen and investigated by a light microscope. Each slide was accessed at 1000 × magnification under oil emersion, and Cryptosporidium spp. was confirmed using morphological characteristic of oocysts. The positive samples were preserved in 2.5% potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) and stored at 4°C until DNA extraction.

3.4. DNA Extraction

Approximately 200 μL of concentrated oocysts of each sample was added to a 2.0-mL eppendorf tube. The samples were pretreated by the freeze and thaw method by liquid nitrogen to break down the oocyst walls. Briefly, tubes were placed in liquid nitrogen for 15 minutes, and were then transferred to 100°C water bath for another 5 minutes. These steps were repeated for a total of 5 times. Next, the genomic DNA was purified using the AccuPrep® Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Bioneer, Korea), according to the manufacturer’s instruction. DNA was eluted in 100 μL of elution buffer and stored at -20°C.

3.5. Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplification

The PCR protocol, based on the amplification of a specific sequence of the SSU rRNA gene, was used to detect Cryptosporidium by primers CryF: (5′-CTGACCTATCAGCTTTAGA- 3′) and CryR: (5′-GCTGAAGGAGTAAGGAACA- 3′), which produced a piece of DNA with a molecular weight of 720 bp (17). In order to perform the PCR reaction, AccuPower® PCR PreMix(Bioneer, Korea) was used, including Taq polymerase enzyme, dNTP, MgCL2, reaction buffer, and tracking dye. In this step, 15 μL of deionized distilled water, 2.20 μL of extracted genomic DNA (100 ng), and 1 μL of forward and reverse primers at 25 pmol were applied in a total volume of 25 μL. The PCR condition was as follows: predenaturation at 94°C for 4 minutes; denaturation at 94°C for 1 minute, annealing at 52°C for 1 minute and extension at 72°C for 1 minute, followed by 30 cycles; final extension at 72°C for 5 minutes in a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, US). The PCR product was analyzed by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel in 1X TBE buffer and visualized using ethidium bromide staining on UV transilluminator.

4. Results

The frequency of Cryptosporidium infection in dogs by PCR was 12.3% (95% CI: 8.86% to 15.75%). Also the frequency of Cryptosporidium infection in dogs using staining and molecular methods were 8% (28/350) and 12.3% (43/350), respectively (Figure 2). In this study a comparison was made between gender, age, and geographical areas of dogs to assess the existence of Cryptosporidium spp. Investigation results indicated that the frequency of Cryptosporidium spp. infection in stools collected from villages in different geographical areas of Khuzestan province including east, west, north, south, and center were 4.28%, 12.85%, 11.42%, 24.28%, and 10%, respectively. The statistical analysis showed a significant relationship between geographical areas and frequency of Cryptosporidium spp. in dogs (P < 0.05). The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference among gender and age groups as indicated by staining and PCR methods for diagnosis of Cryptosporidium in females and males (P > 0.05) (Table 1).

Figure 2. Polymerase Chain Reaction of Cryptosporidium spp. in Dog Feces Samples
Polymerase Chain Reaction of Cryptosporidium spp. in Dog Feces Samples

M, 100 bp molecular marker; C.P, positive control; C.N, negative control; 1 - 7 lines, positive samples; line 8, negative sample.

Table 1. Frequency of Cryptosporidium spp. in Different Regions of Khuzestan Provincea
FactorDiagnostic Technique
StainingPCR
Gender
Male17/215 (7.9)26/215 (12)
Female11/135 (8.14)17/135 (12.6)
Age, y
< 12/76 (2.63)4/76 (5.26)
1 - 517/199 (8.54)28/199 (14.07)
> 59/75 (12)11/75 (14.67)
Geographical areasb
East2/70 (2.86)3/70 (4.29)
West6/70 (8.57)9/70 (12.86)
North5/70 (7.14)7/70 (10)
South10/70 (14.28)17/70 (24.3)
Center5/70 (7.14)7/70 (10)
Positive28 (8)43 (12.3)
Negative307322
Total350350

aValues are expressed as No. (%).

bThe frequency of Cryptosporidium spp. in dogs indicated a statistically significant relationship with geographical areas, according to diagnostic techniques (P < 0.05).

5. Discussion

Cryptosporidiosis is a zoonotic protozoal disease, which is reported in animals and humans with worldwide distribution in more than 106 countries, especially in developing countries (18, 19), and may cause gastrointestinal problems such as diarrhea in immunocompromised and immunocompetent people and even the environment (5). Molecular epidemiological investigations strongly suggest that zoonotic species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium play an important role in cryptosporidiosis and were mentioned as a risk factor for human cryptosporidiosis (20). A single oocyst is sufficient to produce infection and disease in susceptible hosts (21). Dogs are often considered faithful friends and intimate companions of humans from very early in human history that can act as definitive or reservoir hosts for a large number of zoonosis parasitic diseases of parasitic zoonoses, such as Taenia sp., Echinococcus sp., Toxocara canis, Giardia spp., and Cryptosporidium spp. (22). Dogs are vertebrate animals that are infected with Cryptosporidium spp. in the wildlife and represent a potentially significant source of environmental contamination and reservoir of the disease for domestic livestock and humans, due to transmission of the infection through close contact with infected dogs (21).

Epidemiological studies on Cryptosporidium infection indicated that the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in dogs is very different in various countries (from 0% to 52.7%) (23-26); a prevalence of 1.4% in the Czech Republic (27), 2.1% in Thailand (28), 2.4% in Brazil (29), 3.9% in Japan (30), 4.1% in Northern Spain (31), 18.5% in Nigeria (32), and 52.7% in Romania. This difference depends on factors, such as geographical location, the number of dogs, status of animals ownership, existence and number of other hosts correlated with dogs, including domestic animals (such as cattle, horses, sheep, goats, and pigs), species of Cryptosporidium, sampling protocols, anthelmintic use, and diagnostic techniques (33, 34).

Infected dogs with cryptosporidiosis shed oocysts with their feces, which can contaminate environment. Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts are resistant to harsh environmental conditions and can be well preserved under cold and wet environments. In addition, these are very resistant to the most common disinfectants, therefore, can contaminate water, and there is a potential risk for areas with a large dog population (35-37). Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in geographical regions of Khuzestan province, southwest of Iran, is variable and it seems that the prevalence of this protozoa in south of the province is higher than other areas (38-40).

The current findings may be due to the following reasons; southern provinces have a high temperature and humid weather conditions, life style of people regarding consumption of seafood more than other regions, and birds immigration to south of Khuzestan province, which may be carriers of infection. In Iran, people who live in villages because of lifestyle and closely related agricultural and animal husbandry sources are exposed to zoonotic pathogenesis microorganisms, such as parasitic zoonoses. Therefore, the potential for zoonotic transmission from domestic animals such as dogs, that are reservoirs via environmental contamination, is of increasing concern.

In the current study, Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts were identified in 8% (28/350) and 12.3% (43/350) of samples examined using staining and molecular methods, respectively. This rate is more than the results of some previous studies, which were carried out about cryptosporidiosis in dogs of different areas of Iran. Bahrami et al. (41) reported 7.04% infection in stray dogs of Ilam using the Ziehl-Neelsen staining method. In another study conducted in the Southeast of Iran (Kerman), prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. was 2% using the formalin ether sedimentation and modified Ziehl-Neelsen staining technique. In addition, Gharekhani (42) reported that 3.8% of the infections among pet dogs in Hamedan in Western Iran were infected with Cryptosporidium spp. by formalin-ether and modified Ziehl-Neelsen technique.

The study of prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of pet dogs in Tehran (Central Iran) and Urmia (Northwest of Iran) indicated that 1.6% and 2.9% of animals were infected with Cryptosporidium spp., respectively (43, 44). In another study, Mosallanejad et al. (45) investigated the prevalence of C. parvum in urban and rural dogs of Ahvaz district by using antigenic detection and modified Ziehl-Neelsen staining methods, the results of which indicated 4.3% and 2.5% of dogs were infected, as indicated by ELISA and staining methods. Also, the infection had greater prevalence in rural dogs (6.4%) in comparison with urban dogs (2.17%). The results were in agreement with other studies in different parts of the world, such as Bahía Blanca of Argentina that indicated 14.7% of dogs were infected with Cryptosporidium spp. (9). The results of the current study showed that the frequency of Cryptosporidium spp. in feces of dogs in villages of Ahvaz was high.

Despite the results of the current study, in some researches the frequency of Cryptosporidium infection was higher in young dogs (21, 31, 33, 46). Some studies in comparison to the current study indicated that infection rates in female dogs were higher than male dogs, which may be due to reduced immunity at certain periods in female physiologic cycle (32). Other investigations in Iran indicated that female dogs had more infection than male dogs. Bahrami et al. and Gharekhani reported that the prevalence of Cryptosporidium in female dogs of Ilam and Hamedan were more than male dogs (41, 42). Also, Mirzaei showed that the prevalence of Cryptosporidium in female dogs was higher than male dogs in Kerman (34). Although the role of infected dogs in transmission of Cryptosporidium infection to humans is not exactly clear, yet, C. canis can be infect immunocompromised patients. Also, a small number of zoonotic Cryptosporidium including C. parvum, C. muris, and C. meleagridis can infect dogs (12).

The free entrance of stray dogs to public places of villages and existence of owned dogs, such as shepherd dogs in houses has caused defecation in different areas of villages and may contaminate soil, food or water. Therefore, it can be a potential hazard for humans and domestic animals and this phenomenon is important in public health and livestock husbandry.

In conclusion, control programs including, public educational activities, regarding risk of parasite transmission, and role of animals such as dogs in parasite distribution should be considered. It is suggested to conduct control programs, including education for people about cryptosporidiosis and the potential transmission of this protozoan to humans and animals, prevention of free entrance of stray dogs in public places and houses, also collection and hygienic disposal of dogs feces. In addition, determining the frequency and treating cryptosporidiosis in owner dogs should be done by veterinarians or physicians.

References

  • 1.

    Ryan U, Fayer R, Xiao L. Cryptosporidium species in humans and animals: current understanding and research needs. Parasitology. 2014; 141(13) : 1667 -85 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 2.

    Slapeta J. Cryptosporidiosis and Cryptosporidium species in animals and humans: a thirty colour rainbow? Int J Parasitol. 2013; 43(12-13) : 957 -70 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 3.

    Xiao L, Feng Y. Zoonotic cryptosporidiosis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2008; 52(3) : 309 -23 [DOI]

  • 4.

    Guerrant RL. Cryptosporidiosis: an emerging, highly infectious threat. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997; 3(1) : 51 -7 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 5.

    Rossle NF, Latif B. Cryptosporidiosis as threatening health problem: A review. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2013; 3(11) : 916 -24 [DOI]

  • 6.

    Current WL, Garcia LS. Cryptosporidiosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1991; 4(3) : 325 -58 [PubMed]

  • 7.

    Hunter PR, Hadfield SJ, Wilkinson D, Lake IR, Harrison FC, Chalmers RM. Subtypes of Cryptosporidium parvum in humans and disease risk. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007; 13(1) : 82 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 8.

    Awoke E, Bogale B, Chanie M. Intestinal nematode parasites of dogs: Prevalence and associated risk factors. Int J Anim Vet Adv. 2011; 3(5) : 374 -8

  • 9.

    La Sala LF, Leiboff A, Burgos JM, Costamagna SR. Spatial distribution of canine zoonotic enteroparasites in Bahia Blanca, Argentina. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2015; 47(1) : 17 -24 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 10.

    Perera PK, Rajapakse R, Rajakaruna RS. Gastrointestinal parasites of dogs in Hantana area in the Kandy District. J Nat Sci Foundat Sri Lanka. 2013; 41(2)[DOI]

  • 11.

    Fukushima K, Helman RG. Cryptosporidiosis in a pup with distemper. Vet Pathol. 1984; 21(2) : 247 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 12.

    Caccio SM, Widmer G. Cryptosporidium: parasite and disease. 2013;

  • 13.

    Xiao L. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update. Exp Parasitol. 2010; 124(1) : 80 -9 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 14.

    Fayer R, Morgan U, Upton SJ. Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium: transmission, detection and identification. Int J Parasitol. 2000; 30(12-13) : 1305 -22 [PubMed]

  • 15.

    Lopez-Urbina MT, Gonzalez AE, Gomez-Puerta LA, Romero-Arbizu MA, Perales-Camacho RA, Rojo-Vazquez FA, et al. Prevalence of Neonatal Cryptosporidiosis in Andean Alpacas (Vicugna pacos) in Peru. Open Parasitol J. 2009; 3(1) : 9 -13 [DOI]

  • 16.

    Khuzestan Province. 2014;

  • 17.

    Rai AK, Chakravorty R, Paul J. Detection of Giardia, Entamoeba, and Cryptosporidium in unprocessed food items from northern India. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008; 24(12) : 2879 -87 [DOI]

  • 18.

    Dillingham RA, Lima AA, Guerrant RL. Cryptosporidiosis: epidemiology and impact. Microbes Infect. 2002; 4(10) : 1059 -66 [PubMed]

  • 19.

    Thompson A. Review of "Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis" by Ronald Fayer and Lihua Xiao (eds.). Parasit Vectors. 2008; 1(1) : 47 [DOI]

  • 20.

    Xiao L, Fayer R. Molecular characterisation of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium and Giardia and assessment of zoonotic transmission. International J Parasitol. 2008; 38(11) : 1239 -55 [DOI]

  • 21.

    Ramirez NE, Ward LA, Sreevatsan S. A review of the biology and epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis in humans and animals. Microb Infect. 2004; 6(8) : 773 -85 [DOI]

  • 22.

    Jian F, Qi M, He X, Wang R, Zhang S, Dong H, et al. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium in dogs in Henan Province, China. BMC Vet Res. 2014; 10 : 26 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 23.

    Batchelor DJ, Tzannes S, Graham PA, Wastling JM, Pinchbeck GL, German AJ. Detection of endoparasites with zoonotic potential in dogs with gastrointestinal disease in the UK. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2008; 55(2) : 99 -104 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 24.

    Hackett T, Lappin MR. Prevalence of enteric pathogens in dogs of north-central Colorado. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2003; 39(1) : 52 -6 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 25.

    Katagiri S, Oliveira-Sequeira TC. Prevalence of dog intestinal parasites and risk perception of zoonotic infection by dog owners in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Zoonoses Public Health. 2008; 55(8-10) : 406 -13 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 26.

    Simpson JW, Burnie AG, Miles RS, Scott JL, Lindsay DI. Prevalence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium infection in dogs in Edinburgh. Vet Rec. 1988; 123(17) : 445 [PubMed]

  • 27.

    Dubna S, Langrova I, Napravnik J, Jankovska I, Vadlejch J, Pekar S, et al. The prevalence of intestinal parasites in dogs from Prague, rural areas, and shelters of the Czech Republic. Vet Parasitol. 2007; 145(1-2) : 120 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 28.

    Koompapong K, Mori H, Thammasonthijarern N, Prasertbun R, Pintong AR, Popruk S, et al. Molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in seagulls, pigeons, dogs, and cats in Thailand. Parasite. 2014; 21 : 52 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 29.

    Huber F, Bomfim TCB, Gomes RS. Comparison between natural infection by Cryptosporidium sp., Giardia sp. in dogs in two living situations in the West Zone of the municipality of Rio de Janeiro. Vet Parasitol. 2005; 130(1-2) : 69 -72 [DOI]

  • 30.

    Yoshiuchi R, Matsubayashi M, Kimata I, Furuya M, Tani H, Sasai K. Survey and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia spp. in owned companion animal, dogs and cats, in Japan. Vet Parasitol. 2010; 174(3-4) : 313 -6 [DOI]

  • 31.

    Gil H, Cano L, de Lucio A, Bailo B, de Mingo MH, Cardona GA, et al. Detection and molecular diversity of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in sheltered dogs and cats in Northern Spain. Infect Genet Evol. 2017; 50 : 62 -9 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 32.

    Olabanji GM, Maikai BV, Otolorin GR. Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated with Faecal Shedding ofCryptosporidiumOocysts in Dogs in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria. Vet Med Int. 2016; 2016 : 1 -6 [DOI]

  • 33.

    Titilincu A, Mircean V, Achelaritei D, Cozma V. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in asymptomatic dogs by ELISA and risk factors associated with infection. Lucrari Stiinłifice Medicina Veterinara. 2010; 43(1)

  • 34.

    Mirzaei M. Epidemiological survey of Cryptosporidium spp. in companion and stray dogs in Kerman, Iran. Vet Ital. 2012; 48(3) : 291 -6 [PubMed]

  • 35.

    Campbell I, Tzipori A, Hutchison G, Angus K. Effect of disinfectants on survival of cryptosporidium oocysts. Vet Record. 1982; 111(18) : 414 -5 [DOI]

  • 36.

    Dorny P, Praet N, Deckers N, Gabriel S. Emerging food-borne parasites. Vet Parasitol. 2009; 163(3) : 196 -206 [DOI]

  • 37.

    Fayer R. Cryptosporidium: a water-borne zoonotic parasite. Vet Parasitol. 2004; 126(1-2) : 37 -56 [DOI]

  • 38.

    Hoghooghi-Rad N. Some epidemiological aspects of cryptosporidiosis in ahwaz, capital of khoozestan province, islamic republic of Iran. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 1994; 8(1) : 17 -22

  • 39.

    Rafiei A, Rahdar M, Valipour Nourozi R. Isolation and Identification of Parasitic Protozoa in Sampled Water From the Southwest of Iran. Jundishapur J Health Sci. 2014; 6(4)[DOI]

  • 40.

    Rafiei A, Rashno Z, Samarbafzadeh A, Khademvatan S. Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. Isolated From Immunocompromised Patients and Children. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014; 7(4)[DOI]

  • 41.

    Bahrami A, Doosti A, Nahravanian H, Noorian AM, Asbchin SA. Epidemiological survey of gastro-intestinal parasites in stray dogs and cats. Australian J Basic App Sci. 2011; 5(9)

  • 42.

    Gharekhani J. Study on Gastrointestinal Zoonotic Parasites in Pet Dogs in Western Iran. Turk J Parasitol. 2014; 38(3) : 172 -6 [DOI]

  • 43.

    Dalimiasl A, Mojarad KS, Jamshidi S. Intestinal parasites of pet dogs in Tehran and evaluation of knowledge of dog owners about zoonotic risk of parasites of dog. J Vet Res. 2001; 56 : 6 -13

  • 44.

    Tavassoli M, Javadi S, Soltanalinejad F, Rosouli S, Etminanfar R. Gastrointestinal parasites of pet dogs in Urmia city. Vet J. 2010;

  • 45.

    Mosallanejad B, Hamidinejat H, Avizeh R, Ghorbanpoor Najafabadi M, Razi Jalali MH. Antigenic detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in urban and rural dogs in Ahvaz district, outhwestern Iran. Iran J Vet Res. 2010; 11(3) : 273 -8

  • 46.

    Hamnes IS, Gjerde BK, Robertson LJ. A longitudinal study on the occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in dogs during their first year of life. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 2007; 49(1) : 22 [DOI]

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: