IF: 0.957
Cite Score:
1.46
THOMSON REUTERS - SCOPUS

Production of Monoclonal Antibody Against Recombinant Polypeptide From the Erns Coding Region of the Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus

AUTHORS

Masood Reza Seyfi Abad Shapouri 1 , Maryam Ekhtelat 2 , * , Masood Ghorbanpoor Najaf Abadi 1 , Pezhman Mahmoodi Koohi 3 , Mohsen Lotfi 4

AUTHORS INFORMATION

1 Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, IR Iran

2 Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IR Iran

3 Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Para Veterinary Science, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, IR Iran

4 Department of Quality Control, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Karaj, IR Iran

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology: 8 (12); e26727
Published Online: December 26, 2015
Article Type: Research Article
Received: January 13, 2015
Revised: June 7, 2015
Accepted: July 6, 2015
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) is an economically important cattle disease with a worldwide distribution. Detection and elimination of animals persistently infected (PI) with bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) is essential for the control of BVD and eradication of BVDV. There are usually no pathognomonic clinical signs of BVDV infection. Diagnostic investigations therefore rely on laboratory-based detection of the virus, or virus-induced antigens or antibodies.

Objectives: Erns as an immunogenic protein of BVDV, is genetically and antigenically conserved among different isolates and therefore, is a candidate antigen for development of the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for serological studies or identification of PI animals. The aim of this study was to produce a monoclonal antibody (MAb) against recombinant Erns.

Materials and Methods: For this purpose, recombinant maltose-binding protein (MBP)-Erns protein was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified using amylose resin chromatography column and used as an antigen in MAb production. Spleen cells of the immunized mice with the recombinant antigen were fused with SP2/0 myeloma cells. Next, culture supernatants of primary clones of fused cells were screened by indirect ELISA. After three rounds of cloning, the reactivity of the MAbs with recombinant and natural antigen was established by Western blotting.

Results: Based on our results, MAb against recombinant Erns was produced and reacted successfully with recombinant and natural antigens.

Conclusions: With regards to the role of Erns in the identification of PI animals, it appears that Erns recombinant antigen and the specific monoclonal antibodies produced against it may be suitable for developing BVDV laboratory diagnostic assays.

Keywords

Bovine Viral Diarrhea Monoclonal Antibody Recombinant Erns

Copyright © 2015, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background

Bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) is one of the most important diseases of cattle, worldwide (1). Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) causes immunosuppression, and reproductive, digestive and respiratory disorders in cattle. Clinical conditions can most often be from subclinical to severe hemorrhagic (2). Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus causes significant economic losses in the cattle industry. Bovine fetuses infected with BVDV between days 30 and 125 of gestation can develop immune tolerance against the virus and will be born persistently infected (PI) (3). Cattle infected persistently, as a continuing source of the virus and the main factor in transmission of the disease between and among herds, are the main source of BVDV and a primary factor in the epidemiology of the disease (4). Persistently Infected animals are virus positive and antibody negative when they are infected with a sole genotype or subtype of BVDV (5). These animals can be identified by the combined use of serological and virological tests (6). Detection and elimination of infected animals, especially PI animals, is essential to control and eradicate BVDV infections (7).

Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus is a member of the Pestivirus genus in the Flaviviridae family. Among viral proteins, Erns (previously E0 or gp48), E2 structural proteins and the non-structural NS3 protein have been identified as the principal immunogens of BVDV (8). Envelope glycoprotein Erns, encoding a dsRNase, that is capable of apoptosis and Interferon synthesis, is efficiently inhibited by the dsRNase (9). Bovine viral diarrhea virus particles present the Erns in multiple copies on their envelope. Moreover, large amounts of a soluble form of Erns are shed in the medium by BVDV-infected cells (5, 10). This finding and the fact that Erns is genetically and antigenically conserved among different isolates (11) have permitted the use of Erns as a useful marker for the identification of PI animals. During the recent years, control programs aiming at eradicating BVD, have consequently attracted increasing interest, compared to BVD management by vaccination (12).

Many European countries are conducting a program for BVDV control and eradication, and the first goal of this program is the detection and elimination of PI animals (13). In Iran, the prevalence of BVDV antibodies in adult cattle is around 25% (14, 15). It is therefore desirable to have a rapid, sensitive and reliable means of identifying infected animals for control and eradication of BVD. Virus isolation, RT-PCR and most often antigen detection are the basis for the diagnosis of persistent infection (16). For this purpose, commercial antigen capture enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (AC-ELISA) kits, exploiting Erns-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) were designed and used for identification of PI animals, which constitute 1% - 2% of cattle populations in endemic areas (5). Until now, Erns-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have been produced following immunization with the whole virus.

2. Objectives

The main objective of this study was to produce monoclonal antibody (MAb) for the first time against recombinant Erns antigen of BVDV, which was produced in an efficient bacterial expression system, to design a local AC-ELISA for detecting PI animals in the future.

3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Purification of Maltose-Binding Protein-Erns Fusion Protein

Recombinant MBP-Erns protein in pMalc2x expression vector, under the control of the lac promoter in Escherichia coli BL-21 strain had been previously produced and expressed in our laboratory (17). After expression, the bacterial pellet was resuspended in column buffer and sonicated to release the bacterial proteins. Purification of the expressed protein (MBP-Erns) from the supernatant of the sonicated bacteria was carried out on a column of maltose-affinity chromatography based amylose resin, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (18). In order achieve this in the first step, the purification was performed based on MBP’s affinity to amylase. Then in the second step, the MBP-Erns protein was detached from amylose resin by using 10 mM maltose solution as a competitor of amylase. Maltose-binding protein is a fusion partner of about 42 kDa (without expression of the alpha fragment of the beta galactosidase) encoded by pMAL-c2X plasmid vector at the N-terminus part of recombinant proteins. The MBP molecule plus the alpha fragment of the beta galactosidase with an approximate weight of 50 kDa is present in bacteria containing only pMAL-c2X. Several studies have shown that MBP is a soluble protein and can even solubilize fused recombinant proteins (19, 20). As solubility of the recombinant protein was enhanced by MBP at the beginning of the recombinant molecule, the purification processes were done without any need of treatment with chemical substances like urea. Finally, the recombinant protein (MBP-Erns) in collected samples was examined by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).

3.2. Immunization

BALB/c mice are usually chosen as the source of immune spleen cells, because the myeloma cells used for fusion are of BALB/c origin. For this purpose, four to six-week-old BALB/c mice (obtained from the Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Iran) were immunized by intraperitoneal injection of 100 µg of purified MBP-Erns on days 0, 15 and 34. The first injection was with complete freund’s adjuvant (CFA). The Second and third injections were performed using incomplete freund’s adjuvant (IFA), in order to stimulate a good immune response. The mice were tail-bled, and the serum was assayed for antibody activity by an indirect ELISA on day 45, after the first injection. Mice with the highest titer of anti-Erns antibodies by indirect ELISA were selected and three days before the fusion, a booster injection of MBP-Erns without adjuvant was performed and their spleens were removed for fusion (21, 22).

3.3. Preparation of Myeloma and Mouse Feeder Cells

SP2/0 murine myeloma cell line is a good fusion partner for immune spleen cells because of its good growth rate, efficiency of hybridoma production after fusion and because it doesn’t synthesize or secrete any immunoglobulin chains. The SP2/0 cells were cultured with 8-azaguanine to ensure their sensitivity to hypoxanthine aminopterin thymidine (HAT) selection medium, used after cell fusion. About 1 × 107 SP2/0 cells in the logarithmic phase with viability of more than 95% were used for fusion. Mouse peritoneal cells (feeder cells), most of which are macrophages, are an effective source of soluble growth factors for hybridoma cells. For Preparation of feeder cells, adult BALB/c mice were killed and 8 mL of 0/34 M chilled sucrose solution was injected peritoneally, entering directly at the base of the sternum and rest tip of the needle over the liver. After a gentle massage of the abdomen, the fluid was withdrawn and viable cells were counted and diluted with HAT medium (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY) to 1 × 105 feeder cells/mL. This cell suspension was added to the 60 inner wells of 96-well plates, 24 hours before fusion (22).

3.4. Hybridoma Production

For hybridoma production, 1 × 107 SP2/0 myeloma cells in the logarithmic phase were fused with 1 × 108 spleen cells from the immunized mice using polyethylene glycol (Sigma, USA), as the fusing agent. The cells in the fusion mix were resuspended in 35 mL of HAT medium and incubated at least 30 minutes in a CO2 incubator. Then, 100 µL of the fusion mixture were distributed to the 60 inner wells containing feeder cells in 96-well plates and incubated five days in a CO2 incubator. After five days, 100 µL of HAT medium was added to each well and replaced with fresh HAT medium every other day (22). Aminopterin in the HAT medium blocks the de novo pathway. Hence, unfused myeloma cells die, as they cannot produce nucleotides by de novo or salvage pathway. Unfused B cells (spleen cells) die as they have a short lifespan. In this way, only the B cell-myeloma hybrids survive. These cells produce antibodies (a property of B cells) and are immortal (a property of myeloma cells) (21).

3.5. Detection of Anti-Erns Antibody Secreting Hybrids

Two weeks after fusion, when hybrid cells reached 10% to 50% confluence, culture supernatants were screened by indirect ELISA. Enzyme immunoassay (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) plates were coated with 50 µL recombinant MBP-Erns per well at a concentration of 2 µg/mL in coating buffer (0.5 M NaHO3/Na2CO3, pH 9.3) at 4°C, overnight (MBP-Erns ELISA). Also, recombinant MBP was coated concurrently and separately (MBP ELISA). The unspecific bindings were blocked with 0.05% (v/v) phosphate buffered saline tween-20 (PBST) containing 5% skim milk powder, after incubation for two hours at 37°C and three washes with PBST. The supernatant of hybridoma was incubated for one hour at 37°C, with sera (1:2000 in PBST containing 2% skim milk) from non-immunized and immunized mice as negative and positive controls, respectively, and also a supernatant of other hybridoma as a negative control. Next, plates were washed three times with PBST. The bound antibodies were detected with goat anti-mouse IgG peroxidase (Sigma, USA) diluted 1:2000 in PBST containing 2% skim milk buffer, after incubation for one hour at 37°C. Finally, tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) peroxidase substrate solution was added and left for 10 minutes at room temperature in the dark. The reaction was stopped by stop solution (1M H2SO4) and the absorbance was read at 450 nm using the Dynatec-MR 5000 ELISA reader. Positive hybrids in MBP-Erns ELISA, which didn’t react with recombinant MBP in MBP ELISA, were considered as positive (22).

3.6. Isolation and Cloning of Hybridoma Cells

Several cloning rounds were carried out until more than 90% of the wells containing single clones were positive for antibody production, indicating that the cells were identical and had the same origin. For this purpose, positive clones were expanded in 24-well plates containing feeder cell and were grown overnight in a CO2 incubator. The positive hybrids were then cloned by limiting dilution (8 cells/mL) in hypoxanthine thymidine (HT) medium (HAT without aminopterin) and distributing 100 µL of the dilution in 96-well plates. The single clones with the highest anti-Erns antibody titers using indirect ELISA were sub-cloned at least three times until all sub-cloned supernatants were positive for antibody production. After three rounds of cloning, positive cultures were grown to larger volumes and frozen in liquid N2, as soon as possible, in fetal bovine serum (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY) containing 10% of DMSO (22).

3.7. Reactivity of MAbs to Recombinant and Natural Antigens by Western Blotting

The stability of antibody secretion in the positive clones after three rounds of cloning was monitored by ELISA and the reactivity of the anti-Erns MAbs to recombinant and natural Erns was evaluated by Western blotting. At first, recombinant Erns antigen was electrophoresed on 10% vertical SDS-polyacrylamide gel and the protein band was transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Following transfer, the nitrocellulose membrane was cut into strips and blocked with PBST containing 5% skim milk, after two hours of incubation at 37°C and three washes with PBST. The strips were then incubated for one hour with the supernatant of each positive hybridoma, separately. Concurrently, the supernatant of other hybridoma as the negative control and also sera (1:2000) from non-immunized and immunized mice were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Finally, the strips were washed again as above and incubated for one hour with goat anti-mouse IgG peroxidase diluted to 1:2000 in PBST containing 2% skim milk. After washing, the strips were developed by 4-chloro 1-naphtol (Sigma, USA) and H2O2 as the substrate (22). For reactivity of MAbs to natural Erns antigen, BVD virus propagated in bovine turbinate (BT) cells and the culture medium was centrifuged and the precipitate was suspended in 200 μL of SDS-PAGE sample buffer and 200 μL PBS. This sample as the natural Ag with MBP and recombinant nucleoprotein of influenza virus as the marker in a separate well were electrophoresed in 10% SDS-PAGE. At the completion of electrophoresis, the gel related to markers was cut and stained with coomassie blue and the rest gel was evaluated by Western blotting, following the same procedures as before (22).

4. Results
4.1. Expression and Purification of MBP-Erns Fusion Protein

Expression of recombinant MBP-Erns protein in pMalc2x expression vector in E. coli BL-21 strain was induced by adding IPTG (isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside) to the bacterial culture based the instruction of pMalc2x expression system (18). Protein profiles of induced and non-induced bacteria by SDS-PAGE revealed that at least two polypeptides of 62 and 66 KDa were expressed in the induced bacteria (Figure 1). Considering molecular weights of 42 and 24 kDa for MBP and Erns respectively, MBP-Erns fusion protein was estimated to have an approximate molecular weight of 66 kDa. The protein expression was confirmed by Western blotting, using BVDV antibody positive bovine serum. After purification of the expressed protein (MBP-Erns) from the supernatant of the sonicated bacteria on a column of amylose resin and analysis by SDS-PAGE, a major protein band of 66 kDa and multiple smaller bands indicated that the MBP-Erns fusion protein was subjected, in some extent, to proteolytic cleavage (s) in the bacterial host (Figure 2). Therefore, all of the expressed and purified polypeptides seemed be related to the MBP-Erns fusion protein.

Figure 1. Expression Profiles of Bacteria Containing Recombinant Plasmids
Expression Profiles of Bacteria Containing Recombinant Plasmids

The molecular weight marker is shown in Lane 1. Lane 2 indicates a control colony (containing only pMAL-c2X) expressing MBP (50 KDa). Lanes 3 and 4 belong to bacteria expressing the MBP-Erns fusion protein before and after induction by IPTG, respectively. The expression of a protein of about 66 kDa, corresponding to the predicted molecular weight of MBP-Erns is shown in lane 4.

Figure 2. Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis Analysis of Purified MBP-Erns Fusion Protein by the Amylose-Resin Column
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis Analysis of Purified MBP-Erns Fusion Protein by the Amylose-Resin Column

Lane 1, protein molecular weight marker; lane 2, purified MBP from the control colony containing only pMAL-c2X; lane 3, purified preparation of the MBP-Erns fusion protein.

4.2. Hybridoma Production and Isolation

After immunizing mice with the recombinant MBP-Erns, anti-Erns antibody in the serum of mice was detected by indirect ELISA on day 45 and the absorbance was read at 450 nm using the ELISA reader. The optical density (OD) values of immunized sera (1:2000 dilution) were from 1.54 to 1.72 compared with the OD value of non-immunized serum (negative control), which was 0.08. Spleen cells of the immunized mouse, with the highest titer of anti-Erns antibody, were fused with SP2/0 myeloma cells using polyethylene glycol (PEG). The cells in the fusion mix were resuspended in HAT medium and distributed in 96-well plates. Hybrids were selected by their ability to grow in HAT medium and when hybrid cells reached 10% to 50% confluence, culture supernatants of primary clones were screened by MBP-Erns ELISA and MBP ELISA. Positive hybrids in MBP-Erns ELISA, which didn’t react in MBP ELISA were considered as positive. On the basis of primary screening, anti-Erns antibody in the supernatant of eight clones was identified with OD value from 0.2 to 1.1 (average 0.44). The positive clones with the highest titer of anti-Erns antibody were cloned and screened by indirect ELISA three times. The OD values of ELISA were higher, ranging from 1.2 to 2.7 in the second and third rounds of cloning with no reaction towards MBP. However, anti-Erns antibody production was stopped in two clones during cloning, probably due to somatic mutations or deletions of chromosomes.

4.3. Reactivity of MAbs to Recombinant and Natural Antigens

The positive clones after three rounds of cloning were selected and the reactivity of the MAbs with recombinant Erns antigen was screened and established by Western blotting (Figure 3). Also, the specificity and reactivity of the MAbs with the natural form of the Erns antigen, as shown in Figure 4, were examined and confirmed with BVD virus infected cells, as the source of the virus in Western blotting. In the Western blot analysis, anti-Erns MAb reacted with a protein of BVDV that was lower than the 50 kDa marker, which was compatible with the approximate weight of natural Erns (48 kDa) of BVDV.

Figure 3. Reactivity of Supernatants of Subclones Producing Anti-Erns MAbs to Recombinant Erns Antigen by Western Blotting
Reactivity of Supernatants of Subclones Producing Anti-Erns MAbs to Recombinant Erns Antigen by Western Blotting

Lanes 1 and 2 belonged to immunized and non-immunized mice sera as negative and positive controls, respectively; Lanes 3 and 4 represent supernatants of subclones containing anti-Erns MAbs.

Figure 4. Reactivity of Supernatants of Subclones Producing Anti-Erns MAbs to Natural Erns Antigen by Western Blotting
Reactivity of Supernatants of Subclones Producing Anti-Erns MAbs to Natural Erns Antigen by Western Blotting

Lanes 1 shows the purified nucleoprotein of the influenza virus (97 KDa) and purified MBP (50 KDa) from the control colony containing only pMAL-c2X as the protein weight marker. Lanes 2 shows the supernatant of an unrelated hybridoma. Lanes 3 - 5 represent the supernatant of subclones containing anti-Erns MAbs.

5. Discussion

Among viral structural proteins, the Erns glycoprotein has been shown to be a useful marker for identification of PI animals, since it is genetically and antigenically conserved among different isolates (6, 23, 24). To characterize the immune response of cattle to BVDV glycoprotein Erns, Kwang et al., (1992) produced a recombinant insoluble erns-glutathione-s-transferase (GST) fusion protein in E. coli. They found that antibodies to Erns were present in cattle, following vaccination with killed or modified-live viruses, as well as natural infection (25). The BVDV particle presents the 48-kDa glycoprotein (Erns) in multiple copies on its envelope, thus allowing binding and detecting antibodies raise against identical or adjacent epitopes (26). The Erns remains both intracellular and is secreted from infected cells, and can thus be detected both in situ and in serum. Also, Erns appears to be less influenced by inhibition of maternal antibodies in young PI calves (5). Furthermore, PI animals are highly infectious yet often do not manifest their carrier status through obvious clinical symptoms and antibody detection (27).

Identification of these animals is by virus isolation, RT-PCR and detection of viral antigens by immunohistochemistry and AC-ELISA (3). The ELISA is more suited for screening of large series of samples. So far, several BVDV-specific ELISAs have been developed for detection of both antibodies and viral antigens (5). In one research, mAb ELISA was compared with existing ELISAs, which rely on polyclonal antibodies (pAbs) for detecting captured antigens. The mAb detection ELISA was more sensitive than pAb detection ELISAs (28). After BVDV-specific Mabs became available, several laboratory assays reported BVDV detection based on anti BVDV MAbs. Animal sera, whole blood, organ and ear notch tissue samples can be used for BVDV diagnosis. Bedekovic et al. (2011) described an Indirect immunofluorescence (IF) method based on a pool of BVDV-specific monoclonal antibodies (VLA, Weibridge, UK) using ear notch tissue samples, for diagnosis of PI cattle. Compared with the RT-PCR assay, the IF assay had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and is a good alternative to RT-PCR and antigen ELISA with high speed and accuracy (4).

An anti-gp53 (D89) MAb was used in an indirect fluorescence antibody (IFA) procedure on frozen tissue sections and cell culture. The IFA was a suitable diagnostic assay for detection of BVDV. However, combination of D89 with another BVDV MAb may improve the ability to detect all strains of BVDV in tissues (29). Also, one study reported on an indirect immunoperoxidase assay, which used anti-gp53 and anti-NS3 MAbs for detection of BVDV antigens in CNS (30). The utilization of microparticle immunoagglutination assay has been investigated using coated microparticles with anti-BVDV monoclonal antibodies for BVDV detection. The microparticle immunoagglutination was more sensitive than RT-PCR to detect the virus in the shortest time (31). Several AC-ELISA were developed for rapid detection of BVDV, based on either polyclonal Antibodies and MAbs specific for one or more viral antigens following immunization with the whole virus (5, 26).

A research by Mignon et al., (1992) developed an AC-ELISA using anti-gp48 (Erns) and anti-NS3 MAbs for detecting BVDV antigens in blood samples with sensitivity and specificity of 100%. They proved that the AC-ELISA is a good candidate for replacing virus isolation as a reference method for BVDV antigen detection in PI animals (26). On the other hand, the traditional method of virus isolation is protracted, labor intensive and expensive (28). Current testing strategies to detect PI calves rely heavily on immunohistochemistry and a commercially available AC-ELISA assay. These viral assays often depend on monoclonal antibodies, which target the Erns glycoprotein of BVDV (32). The Erns specific monoclonal antibodies are valuable tools in AC-ELISA for identification of PI animals (5). Mars and Van Maanen (2005) showed that the Erns antigen ELISA had 99% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity as compared to RT-PCR (33). In this regard, a commercial, easy to use AC-ELISA kit based on anti-Erns MAbs is available for detection of viral antigens in serum as well as whole blood and even skin biopsies of PI animals (3).

To summarize, in the present study, for the first time, large amounts of immunologically-active recombinant Erns protein in an expression system under the control of the strong promoter (lac) of vector pMalc2x were used to produce anti-Erns MAbs by the cell fusion assay. Anti-Erns MAbs were screened by indirect ELISA and the reactivity of the MAbs with recombinant and natural antigen was established by Western blotting. The economic impact of BVDV infections has led a number of countries in Europe to start eradication or control programs. However, in both cases, the primary step is identification and elimination of PI animals (13). Based on our results, it appears that Erns recombinant antigen and the specific monoclonal antibodies produced against it may be suitable for developing BVDV laboratory diagnostic assays, especially AC-ELISA.

Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
1 Gunn GJ, Saatkamp HW, Humphry RW, Stott AW. Assessing economic and social pressure for the control of bovine viral diarrhoea virus. Prev Vet Med. 2005; 72(1-2): 149-62[DOI][ PubMed ]
2 Grooms D, Baker JC, Ames TR. Diseases caused by bovine virus diarrhea virus. Large Animal Internal Medicine. 3 ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2002; : 707-14
3 Hilbe M, Stalder H, Peterhans E, Haessig M, Nussbaumer M, Egli C, et al. Comparison of five diagnostic methods for detecting bovine viral diarrhea virus infection in calves. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007; 19(1): 28-34[ PubMed ]
4 Bedekovic T, Lemo N, Lojkic I, Cvetnic Z, Cac Z, Madic J. Development of an indirect immunofluorescence assay for diagnosis of bovine viral diarrhoea virus on ear notch tissue samples in cattle infected persistently. J Virol Methods. 2011; 178(1-2): 59-62[DOI][ PubMed ]
5 Sandvik T. Selection and use of laboratory diagnostic assays in BVD control programmes. Prev Vet Med. 2005; 72(1-2): 3-16[DOI][ PubMed ]
6 Grego E, Uslenghi F, Strasser M, Luzzago C, Frigerio M, Peletto S, et al. Development and application of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of bovine viral diarrhea antibody based on Erns glycoprotein expressed in a baculovirus system. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007; 19(1): 21-7[ PubMed ]
7 Laureyns J, Ribbens S, de Kruif A. Control of bovine virus diarrhoea at the herd level: Reducing the risk of false negatives in the detection of persistently infected cattle. Vet J. 2010; 184(1): 21-6[DOI][ PubMed ]
8 Chimeno Zoth S, Taboga O. Multiple recombinant ELISA for the detection of bovine viral diarrhoea virus antibodies in cattle sera. J Virol Methods. 2006; 138(1-2): 99-108[DOI][ PubMed ]
9 Iqbal M, Poole E, Goodbourn S, McCauley JW. Role for bovine viral diarrhea virus Erns glycoprotein in the control of activation of beta interferon by double-stranded RNA. J Virol. 2004; 78(1): 136-45[ PubMed ]
10 Grummer B, Beer M, Liebler-Tenorio E, Greiser-Wilke I. Localization of viral proteins in cells infected with bovine viral diarrhoea virus. J Gen Virol. 2001; 82: 2597-605[DOI][ PubMed ]
11 Ridpath JF. Classification and molecular biology. Bovine viral diarrhea virus: diagnosis, management, and control. United State of America: Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing; 2005; : 65-80
12 Brock KV. The persistence of bovine viral diarrhea virus. Biologicals. 2003; 31(2): 133-5[ PubMed ]
13 Greiser-Wilke I, Grummer B, Moennig V. Bovine viral diarrhoea eradication and control programmes in Europe. Biologicals. 2003; 31(2): 113-8[ PubMed ]
14 Haji K, Seyfiabad SM. Serological study of bovine viral diarrhea virus infection of cattle in Ahvaz. J Vet Res. 2007; 62(1): 21-6
15 Morshedi A, Mahmudian A, Dalir NB, Hajizade J. Serological survey of cattle infected with BVD virus by indirect ELISA and comparison of the use of milk ELISA and serum ELISA in Urmia. J The Faculty Vet Med 2004; 59(3): 227-31
16 Kameyama K, Sakoda Y, Tamai K, Igarashi H, Tajima M, Mochizuki T, et al. Development of an immunochromatographic test kit for rapid detection of bovine viral diarrhea virus antigen. J Virol Methods. 2006; 138(1-2): 140-6[DOI][ PubMed ]
17 Ekhtelat M, Seyfiabad Shapouri M, Ghorbanpoor Najafabadi M, Lotfi M, Koohi P. Cloning and expression of recombinant polypeptide from the erns coding region of the bovine viral diarrhoea virus in Escherichia coli. Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2012; 15(4): 236-45
18 pMAL™ Protein Fusion and Purification System. 2007;
19 Kapust RB, Waugh DS. Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein is uncommonly effective at promoting the solubility of polypeptides to which it is fused. Protein Sci. 1999; 8(8): 1668-74[DOI][ PubMed ]
20 Sachdev D, Chirgwin JM. Solubility of proteins isolated from inclusion bodies is enhanced by fusion to maltose-binding protein or thioredoxin. Protein Expr Purif. 1998; 12(1): 122-32[DOI][ PubMed ]
21 Harlow E, Lane D. Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbor Press. 1988; : 139-245
22 Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE. Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, et al. Short protocols in molecular biology, 1995. NY: John Willey and Sons Inc.; 29: 130-5
23 Hulst MM, Moormann RJ. Erns protein of pestiviruses. Methods Enzymol. 2001; 342: 431-40[ PubMed ]
24 Kuhne S, Schroeder C, Holmquist G, Wolf G, Horner S, Brem G, et al. Detection of bovine viral diarrhoea virus infected cattle--testing tissue samples derived from ear tagging using an Erns capture ELISA. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2005; 52(6): 272-7[DOI][ PubMed ]
25 Kwang J, Littledike ET, Donis RO, Dubovi EJ. Recombinant polypeptide from the gp48 region of the bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) detects serum antibodies in vaccinated and infected cattle. Vet Microbiol. 1992; 32(3-4): 281-92[ PubMed ]
26 Mignon B, Waxweiler S, Thiry E, Boulanger D, Dubuisson J, Pastoret PP. Epidemiological evaluation of a monoclonal ELISA detecting bovine viral diarrhoea pestivirus antigens in field blood samples of persistently infected cattle. J Virol Methods. 1992; 40(1): 85-93[ PubMed ]
27 Cunradi CB, Moore R, Killoran M, Ames G. Survey nonresponse bias among young adults: the role of alcohol, tobacco, and drugs. Subst Use Misuse. 2005; 40(2): 171-85[ PubMed ]
28 Entrican G, Dand A, Nettleton PF. A double monoclonal antibody ELISA for detecting pestivirus antigen in the blood of viraemic cattle and sheep. Vet Microbiol. 1995; 43(1): 65-74[ PubMed ]
29 Vickers ML, Minocha HC. Diagnosis of bovine viral diarrhea virus infection using monoclonal antibodies. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1990; 2(4): 300-2
30 Hewicker M, Wohrmann T, Fernandez A, Trautwein G, Liess B, Moennig V. Immunohistological detection of bovine viral diarrhoea virus antigen in the central nervous system of persistently infected cattle using monoclonal antibodies. Vet Microbiol. 1990; 23(1-4): 203-10[ PubMed ]
31 Heinze BC, Song JY, Lee CH, Najam A, Yoon JY. Microfluidic immunosensor for rapid and sensitive detection of bovine viral diarrhea virus. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2009; 138(2): 491-6[DOI]
32 Fulton RW, Hessman B, Johnson BJ, Ridpath JF, Saliki JT, Burge LJ, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic tests used for detection of bovine viral diarrhea virus and prevalence of subtypes 1a, 1b, and 2a in persistently infected cattle entering a feedlot. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006; 228(4): 578-84[DOI][ PubMed ]
33 Mars MH, Van Maanen C. Diagnostic assays applied in BVDV control in The Netherlands. Prev Vet Med. 2005; 72(1-2): 43-8[DOI][ PubMed ]
COMMENTS

LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: