Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison of Culture and PCR Methods for Diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Different Clinical Specimens

Aida Gholoobi 1 , Ali Masoudi-Kazemabad 2 , Mojtaba Meshkat 3 and Zahra Meshkat 4 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Modern Sciences and Technologies, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran
2 Department of Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IR Iran
3 Department of Biostatistics, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, IR Iran
4 Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran
Article information
  • Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology: February 01, 2014, 7 (2); e8939
  • Published Online: February 1, 2014
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: November 4, 2012
  • Revised: December 3, 2012
  • Accepted: June 1, 2013
  • DOI: 10.5812/jjm.8939

To Cite: Gholoobi A, Masoudi-Kazemabad A, Meshkat M, Meshkat Z. Comparison of Culture and PCR Methods for Diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Different Clinical Specimens, Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014 ; 7(2):e8939. doi: 10.5812/jjm.8939.

Abstract
Copyright © 2014, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Global Tuberculosis Programme . Global tuberculosis control: WHO report. 2010;
  • 2. Trent RJ. Molecular Medicine: An Introductory Text. 2005;
  • 3. Soini H, Musser JM. Molecular diagnosis of mycobacteria. Clin Chem. 2001; 47(5): 809-14[PubMed]
  • 4. Mokaddas E, Ahmad S. Development and evaluation of a multiplex PCR for rapid detection and differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex members from non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2007; 60(2-3): 140-4[PubMed]
  • 5. Arjomandzadegan M, Owlia P, Ranjbar R, Farazi AA, Sofian M, Sadrnia M, et al. Rapid and simple approach for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. bovis by detection of regulatory gene whiB7. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2011; 58(1): 65-74[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Coelho AC, Pinto ML, Miranda A, Coelho AM, Pires MA, Matos M. Comparative evaluation of PCR in Ziehl-Neelsen stained smears and PCR in tissues for diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Indian J Exp Biol. 2010; 48(9): 948-50[PubMed]
  • 7. Davis JL, Huang L, Kovacs JA, Masur H, Murray P, Havlir DV, et al. Polymerase chain reaction of secA1 on sputum or oral wash samples for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48(6): 725-32[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Gopinath K, Singh S. Multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection and differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium avium complexes and other Mycobacterial species directly from clinical specimens. J Appl Microbiol. 2009; 107(2): 425-35[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Parsons LM, Brosch R, Cole ST, Somoskovi A, Loder A, Bretzel G, et al. Rapid and simple approach for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates by PCR-based genomic deletion analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002; 40(7): 2339-45[PubMed]
  • 10. Yazdani M, Shahidi S, Shirani M. Urinary polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of urogenital tuberculosis. Urol J. 2008; 5(1): 46-9[PubMed]
  • 11. Elbir H, Abdel-Muhsin AM, Babiker A. A one-step DNA PCR-based method for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex grown on Lowenstein-Jensen media. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008; 78(2): 316-7[PubMed]
  • 12. Espasa M, Gonzalez-Martin J, Alcaide F, Aragon LM, Lonca J, Manterola JM, et al. Direct detection in clinical samples of multiple gene mutations causing resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to isoniazid and rifampicin using fluorogenic probes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005; 55(6): 860-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Farnia PVM, Mohammadi F, Ghadiri Fard F, Doraghi M, Tabatabaee SJ, Zia Zarifi A, et al. Culture Examination. 2009;
  • 14. Farnia PVM, Mohammadi F, Ghadiri Fard F, Doraghi M, Tabatabaee SJ, Zia Zarifi A, et al. Smear and microscopic. 2009;
  • 15. Mirshahabi H, Meshkat Z, Soleimanjahi H, Hassan ZM, Meshkat M. Different DNA extraction methods for paraffin-embedded pathological samples. Iran J Pathol. 2007; 2(4): 159-64
  • 16. Kox LF, Rhienthong D, Miranda AM, Udomsantisuk N, Ellis K, van Leeuwen J, et al. A more reliable PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1994; 32(3): 672-8[PubMed]
  • 17. Field SK, Cowie RL. Lung disease due to the more common nontuberculous mycobacteria. Chest. 2006; 129(6): 1653-72[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Aryan E, Makvandi M, Farajzadeh A, Huygen K, Bifani P, Mousavi SL, et al. A novel and more sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay targeting IS6110 for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Microbiol Res. 2010; 165(3): 211-20[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Ritis K, Tzoanopoulos D, Speletas M, Papadopoulos E, Arvanitidis K, Kartali S, et al. Amplification of IS6110 sequence for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in HIV-negative patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO) and evidence of extrapulmonary disease. J Intern Med. 2000; 248(5): 415-24[PubMed]
  • 20. Ani A, Okpe S, Akambi M, Ejelionu E, Yakubu B, Owolodun O, et al. Comparison of a DNA based PCR method with conventional methods for the detection of M. tuberculosis in Jos, Nigeria. J Infect Develop Countries. 2009; 3(6)[DOI]
  • 21. Chakravorty S, Sen MK, Tyagi JS. Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by smear, culture, and PCR using universal sample processing technology. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(9): 4357-62[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Chagas M, Silva RM, Bazzo ML, Santos JI. The use of polymerase chain reaction for early diagnosis of tuberculosis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2010; 43(6): 543-8[PubMed]
  • 23. Lima SS, Clemente WT, Palaci M, Rosa RV, Antunes CM, Serufo JC. Conventional and molecular techniques in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a comparative study. J Bras Pneumol. 2008; 34(12): 1056-62[PubMed]
  • 24. Parekh KM, Inamdar V, Jog A, Kar A. A comparative study of the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis using conventional tools and Polymerase Chain Reaction. Indian J Tuberculosis. 2006; 53(2): 69
  • 25. Prakash RC, Fathima F, Venkatesh VN, Rao A. Evaluation of PCR for early diagnosis of Tuberculosis. Editor-in-Chief Message. 2012; 1(2)
  • 26. Fallah F, Karimi A, Eslami G, Yousefi B, Yazdanpanah B, Taherpour A. Efficacy of infected tissue sample brief-culture on Lowenstein-Jensen media as pre-polymerase chain reaction (Pre-PCR) to diagnosis of Mycobacterium. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2012; 6(12): 2878-81
  • 27. Gupta P, Singh KP, Tripathi AK, Jain A, Prasad R. Role of polymerase chain reaction as a diagnostic tool in pulmunary tuberculosis. J Resent Adv Appl Sci (JRAAS). 2013; 28: 19-24
  • 28. Park JS, Kang YA, Kwon SY, Yoon HI, Chung JH, Lee CT, et al. Nested PCR in lung tissue for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Eur Respir J. 2010; 35(4): 851-7[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments