Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology

Published by: Kowsar

Study of the Assimilation Rate of Immunoenzymatic Tests and Traditional Serological Methods in the Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis

Homayoon Bashiri 1 , Babak Sayad 1 and Seyed Hamid Madani 1 , *
Authors Information
1 Molecular Pathology Research Center, Imam Reza Hospital Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IR Iran
Article information
  • Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology: June 01, 2013, 6 (4); e4828
  • Published Online: June 10, 2013
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: April 29, 2012
  • Revised: August 18, 2012
  • Accepted: September 3, 2012
  • DOI: 10.5812/jjm.4828

To Cite: Bashiri H, Sayad B, Hamid Madani S. Study of the Assimilation Rate of Immunoenzymatic Tests and Traditional Serological Methods in the Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis, Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2013 ; 6(4):e4828. doi: 10.5812/jjm.4828.

Abstract
Copyright © 2013, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Spink WW. Nature of brucellosis. 1956;
  • 2. Corbel MJ. Brucellosis: epidemiology and prevalence worldwide. 1989;
  • 3. Young EJ. Serologic diagnosis of human brucellosis: analysis of 214 cases by agglutination tests and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis. 1991; 13(3): 359-72
  • 4. Young EJ. Immunology of brucellosis. Madkour's Brucellosis. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. 2001; : 39-50
  • 5. Hatami H. [Clinical epidemiology and bioterrorism related diseases control, Center for disease control of Iran]. 2002;
  • 6. Araj GF. Update on laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010; 36 Suppl 1-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Mantecon Mde L, Gutierrez MP, Zarzosa Mdel P, Fernandez-Lago L, Colmenero Jde D, Vizcaino N, et al. Influence of brucellosis history on serological diagnosis and evolution of patients with acute brucellosis. J Infect. 2008; 57(5): 397-403[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Osoba AO, Balkhy H, Memish Z, Khan MY, Al-Thagafi A, Al Shareef B, et al. Diagnostic value of Brucella ELISA IgG and IgM in bacteremic and non-bacteremic patients with brucellosis. J Chemother. 2001; 13 Suppl 1: 54-9[PubMed]
  • 9. Pakzad P. [Principles of clinical serological tests]. 1996; : 141-8
  • 10. Renukaradhya GJ, Isloor S, Crowther JR, Robinson M, Rajasekhar M. Development and field validation of an avidin-biotin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit for bovine brucellosis. Rev Sci Tech. 2001; 20(3): 749-56[PubMed]
  • 11. Amirzargar A. comparison of diagnostic and bacteriologic tests of brucellosis in Ahwaz province of Iran. J Yasoj Medical Faculty. 2001; 21-22: 60-3
  • 12. Karbasian A. [Application of immunoenzymatic reactions in the diagnosis of human brucellosis]. J Isfahan Medical Faculty. 1: 19-24
  • 13. Lisik D, Sobieszczanska B. [Immunoenzymatic test ELISA in serodiagnosis of chronic brucellosis]. Przegl Epidemiol. 2001; 55(3): 299-303[PubMed]
  • 14. Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R. Principles and practice of Infectious diseases. 2005; 2
  • 15. Grushina T, Atshabar B, Syzdykov M, Daulbaeva S, Tserelson L, Kuznetsov A, et al. Universal indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for monitoring of human and animal brucellosis in Kazakhstan. Vaccine. 2010; 28 Suppl 5-8[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments