Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology

Published by: Kowsar

Study of the Assimilation Rate of Immunoenzymatic Tests and Traditional Serological Methods in the Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis

Homayoon Bashiri 1 , Babak Sayad 1 and Seyed Hamid Madani 1 , *
Authors Information
1 Molecular Pathology Research Center, Imam Reza Hospital Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IR Iran
Article information
  • Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology: June 01, 2013, 6 (4); e4828
  • Published Online: June 10, 2013
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: April 29, 2012
  • Revised: August 18, 2012
  • Accepted: September 3, 2012
  • DOI: 10.5812/jjm.4828

To Cite: Bashiri H, Sayad B, Hamid Madani S. Study of the Assimilation Rate of Immunoenzymatic Tests and Traditional Serological Methods in the Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis, Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2013 ; 6(4):e4828. doi: 10.5812/jjm.4828.

Copyright © 2013, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Spink WW. Nature of brucellosis. 1956;
  • 2. Corbel MJ. Brucellosis: epidemiology and prevalence worldwide. 1989;
  • 3. Young EJ. Serologic diagnosis of human brucellosis: analysis of 214 cases by agglutination tests and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis. 1991; 13(3): 359-72
  • 4. Young EJ. Immunology of brucellosis. Madkour's Brucellosis. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. 2001; : 39-50
  • 5. Hatami H. [Clinical epidemiology and bioterrorism related diseases control, Center for disease control of Iran]. 2002;
  • 6. Araj GF. Update on laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010; 36 Suppl 1-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Mantecon Mde L, Gutierrez MP, Zarzosa Mdel P, Fernandez-Lago L, Colmenero Jde D, Vizcaino N, et al. Influence of brucellosis history on serological diagnosis and evolution of patients with acute brucellosis. J Infect. 2008; 57(5): 397-403[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Osoba AO, Balkhy H, Memish Z, Khan MY, Al-Thagafi A, Al Shareef B, et al. Diagnostic value of Brucella ELISA IgG and IgM in bacteremic and non-bacteremic patients with brucellosis. J Chemother. 2001; 13 Suppl 1: 54-9[PubMed]
  • 9. Pakzad P. [Principles of clinical serological tests]. 1996; : 141-8
  • 10. Renukaradhya GJ, Isloor S, Crowther JR, Robinson M, Rajasekhar M. Development and field validation of an avidin-biotin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit for bovine brucellosis. Rev Sci Tech. 2001; 20(3): 749-56[PubMed]
  • 11. Amirzargar A. comparison of diagnostic and bacteriologic tests of brucellosis in Ahwaz province of Iran. J Yasoj Medical Faculty. 2001; 21-22: 60-3
  • 12. Karbasian A. [Application of immunoenzymatic reactions in the diagnosis of human brucellosis]. J Isfahan Medical Faculty. 1: 19-24
  • 13. Lisik D, Sobieszczanska B. [Immunoenzymatic test ELISA in serodiagnosis of chronic brucellosis]. Przegl Epidemiol. 2001; 55(3): 299-303[PubMed]
  • 14. Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R. Principles and practice of Infectious diseases. 2005; 2
  • 15. Grushina T, Atshabar B, Syzdykov M, Daulbaeva S, Tserelson L, Kuznetsov A, et al. Universal indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for monitoring of human and animal brucellosis in Kazakhstan. Vaccine. 2010; 28 Suppl 5-8[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments